Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megan McGill

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 04:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Megan McGill[edit]

Megan McGill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dosnt have significant roles or WP:SIGCOV - Fails WP:NACTOR, may be WP:TOOSOON CASSIOPEIA(talk) 18:51, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 08:55, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 08:55, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 08:55, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 08:55, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 08:55, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. She was cast in a series a couple of years ago and doesn't appear to have done much before or since according to imdb, 2 refs in the article, 1 ok, 1 youtube. She has a common name which is hard to search but I don't think there is much to be found. Szzuk (talk) 14:31, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete IMDB is not a reliable source, and one source is never enough to pass GNG. The latter fact is ignored by many of the defenders of our overly large number of shallow articles on non-notable actors, but that is another story.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Seems to have had no major roles and does not meet WP:GNG. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:16, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per nom. There is one newspaper source included in the article which suggests she was involved in a 3-month period of filming for a children's TV series after no formal acting training. A quick search did not uncover other coverage in reliable sources. Notability has not been established. Drchriswilliams (talk) 08:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.